Quantcast The Brown Daily Herald

Forensics investigation under prof's guidance

Caitlin Browne

Issue date: 9/7/07 Section: Campus News
  • Print
  • Email
Professor Constantine Gatsonis
Media Credit: Chris Bennett
Professor Constantine Gatsonis

A congressional committee investigating the state of forensic science is being led by a Brown professor. Professor of Medical Science Constantine Gatsonis, director of Brown's Center for Statistical Sciences, heads the committee that first met in January and plans to release its findings in early 2008.

Harry Edwards, former chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Washington, D.C., circuit, co-chairs the committee, which was formed under the auspices of the National Academy of Sciences. The committee's task is to assess the practice of forensic science across the nation and make recommendations on how to improve its application.

Some aspects, such as rates of error, remain unknown for forensics procedures like the analysis of hair and bite marks. Currently, there are no national standards regarding the use of forensic science.

"There's a lot of variability in forensics across various parts of the country, and Congress wanted to have somebody look into (issues such as) training, standards and quality control," he said.

Gatsonis, whose research focuses on statistics related to diagnostic tests, was chosen for the committee due to his expertise in statistics. Other committee members represent disciplines such as forensic science, law and general science.

The National Academies' Committee on Science, Technology, and Law, directed by Anne-Marie Mazza, is a subcommittee of the group investigating forensic science. According to Mazza, the committee was formed because Congress called for an investigation of forensic science in the United States and urged that certain expertise be represented on the committee.

Gatsonis said the committee, which is not the first congressional committee to look into forensics, was composed over a long period and rose "out of an appreciation for the infrastructure of forensics" in the United States.

"There were a number of people and a number of forces that contributed … including people who do forensics, people who are advocates, people who are concerned about the accuracy of forensics, people who have been wrongly convicted and have spoken out," he said.

Congress' charge to the committee was broad. "Part of the motivation for forming this committee was to look at the scientific basis for forensics, and what has to be done to ensure that there is a proper scientific basis for these kinds of disciplines," Gatsonis said.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools


  


Advertisement

Advertisement